• 3 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 25th, 2023

help-circle




















  • Logically it makes complete sense.

    What makes no sense is the counter arguments prove provide such as yourself. We are talking about how to deal with one griefer in a game. And You all don’t want to implement a measure that deals with one griefer because you’re worried that this measure would be abused by 4 griefers working in unison during a match. Just think about that. Where’s the logic there? There isn’t. That makes no sense.

    One person can already single handedly ruin a match so why in the world is it so unacceptable to implement a remedy out of fear that four people could ruin a match by working in unison? You realize it’s far less likely for that to happen than it is for just the one guy to grief?

    There are also very easy and simple ways to mitigate that to make it even more rare and difficult did griefing to occur.

    There’s no sense whatsoever in forcing 4 good gamers to suffer for the acts of one griefer because you are afraid of four griefers.