• 1 Post
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • RT1800 and RT3200 are pretty good candidates as far as pricing goes. (RT1800 is 39$ on Walmart 3rd party right now.)

    Note that RT1800 actually has USB3, whereas RT3200 is USB2, but RT3200 has better OpenWrt support.

    Both have been $50 and under at Walmart.


    Another possible option for a super router is $79 Dynalink; if it was an Asus or Netgear with these same specs, they’d probably be selling it for $200.


    Out of these 3 options, the RT3200 is the most well supported, so if you want it to work, probably get that one.


    Also, WAX202 has been on sale for $29 or $39 often enough, but I think those may be gone; no USB, so, not the best unless you get it super cheap.


    As far as Cudy goes that someone else recommended, I’d advise against it, because it’s missing USB and the specs are often the most barebone compared to alternatives on sale at the same price.


    If I had a strict $40+tax budget, I’d probably investigate if RT1800 is supported properly, and get that one.


  • There should also be a rule that a device weighing more than 1kg (2.2lb) and having MSRP above $999 USD must have a user replaceable storage.

    I’m not aware of any other devices beyond MacBook Air and Pro being affected by such a rule.

    ThinkPad Nano and ThinkPad Snapdragon X13s each weigh just slightly above 1kg and have MSRP above 1k, so they’d also be required to comply, but they already do have removable 2242 NVME storage! Same for LG gram that weighs just 1kg, and many other products.

    The weight of user-replaceable 2280 2TB modules? About 7g, that’s 0.007kg, so you won’t be notice on an MBP that weighs 2.1kg.

    Apple seems to be the only manufacturer that solders SSD, and sells $100 2TB upgrades at $800, for a clear 8x markup. This also means that people will have to throw the entire machine away once they need more storage than 256GB, instead of simply proceeding with a simple 4TB@$100 upgrade in 2025.



  • Oh, yeah, and the weight of the 2280 sticks themselves is like 7g. That’s 0.007kg, so it basically wouldn’t even register on a weight scale.

    For memory, the excuse is LPDDR5 which has to be soldered.

    But for storage, there’s no excuse, except that they started soldering before 2280 NVME became mainstream, so initially Apple’s storage was way faster than the older non-NVME sticks, but that time has long gone.

    I think EU ought to create legislation to combat this digital waste and monopolistic pricing. If the computer retails at or above 1k and weighs above 1kg, it has to have removable storage support via NVME 2230, 2242 or 2280. Apple would probably be the only one that’s affected by such rules, and it’s be dubbed MacBook tax.








  • Seems like a good direction.

    These things already had incredible performance, I’m not sure why Apple would choose to sacrifice battery life for more performance? The people buying these machines, myself included, are pros that need battery life.

    What I’m actually disappointed with, is that M3 is still limited to 24GB RAM, just like M2.

    Yes, that’s much better than just 16GB in M1, but, come on, what is this, enough for like 10 browser tabs in Chrome?

    They’re basically forcing me to get M2 Pro if I need more than 24GB; well, at least I don’t have to sacrifice the battery life as much as with M3 Max, but it’s still extra CPU I don’t need.