He didn’t make bad plays worse by turning it over and threw the ONLY TD pass in the game to a 3rd string TE, so I would say it was good, not great, but good on his part. Bad weather conditions made it more difficult for completions; also, the Jets defense is no pushover either.

On another note, if the run game was effective, I think it would’ve helped the passing game more.

Yes, when they played Tennessee, it was an issue. He was also not looking the QB’s way when the offense knew he was going to be pressured.

Well, the reality is that with Ridder, we have better hope at the playoffs than with Heinicke. The team snapped a 3-game losing streak that had Heinicke under center with a win against our fierce rivals in a must-win situation. This win strengthens our chances of winning the South.

Let’s face it and accept it, with Ridder, the teams wins (and loses). With Heinicke, the team just wasn’t winning. Idk what it is, but eh, let’s ride it out with Ridder.

That red zone INT was on Bijan because he didn’t complete his route by being a yard shy of the ball thrown to. We know that turnovers by Desmond is a recurring theme, but if you’ve watched every game, you would know that Bijan not completing routes or not turning his head for the ball has also been an issue for the rookie, despite his electrifying plays.

I’m fine with criticism, but we gotta be levelheaded also.

Oh, look. We don’t blame QBs now 😂

But but people were saying that with Heinicke, we would start winning.

They wouldn’t listen when I said it was the scheme/HC as opposed to the QB ☕️🐸

They kinda already did with the Van Jefferson acquisition and the trade with Philly.

Heinicke is NOT the long term answer. I just see this team invest time in Ridder because he’s young and currently developing.

Heinicke is 30 years old and played average yesterday. People are just impatient with QBs since the Mike Vick era because when Matt Ryan was throwing for 300 yards or more and multiple TDs a game, they still complained because the team lost games, despite those performances during his tenure.

They’ll culprit the QB, but yesterday was poor play on the defense also. A top-3 unit going against a bottom 5 offense only to let a rookie QB drop 4 scores and more than 200 yards on them.

Also, the OL was awful. They allowed 5 sacks in one half, in ONE half, not to mention the pressures. ST also kept fucking up leaving the O start in their own 10 or less yard line. It’s just hard to get the ball going in that field position with the clock working against you and trailing.

That just wasn’t the case when Heinicke took over.

We need to turn our heads to the HC. In the red zone, he had all his talent only to have Jonnu throw a pass to the 3rd string TE. What the fuck was that

Would you prefer that he didn’t have a clutch winning drive at all? 👀 Because with the 3 that he has, they could easily be 1-6 🤫🤫🤫 You just wanna say illogical shit just because you want to lmao

Read what you said slowly and think about it.

Yes, but he also leads the league in game-winning drives so far. He’s demonstrated that he can lose games but win them as well. It’s part of growing into a professional QB.

You couldn’t have said it better.

I’m just tired of armchair GMs. They wanted Watson, then Willis, then Lamar Jackson, and now they’re drooling over Fields on Twitter because a “pundit” on TV said that he’s a good fit for Atlanta.

I’m just saying we should let Terry and Arthur Smith cook. They understand the game better than we do; otherwise, we wouldn’t be on Reddit discussing this lol

But that bares the question as to why they kept starting Tannehill? Willis has been with the team longer than Levis. Why is Levis starting over Willis?