• 1 Post
  • 54 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 25th, 2023

help-circle


  • I think average have a way to glossing over the real story.

    Fields had two games where he threw for 8 TDs alone…

    In those two games, he was 8 TD to 1 INT.

    In the other 6 of his 2023 games, he is 4 TD to 5 INT.

    Even in the Denver game, Fields disappeared in the 3rd and 4th quarter, losing a fumble that resulted in a Denver TD and he threw an INT with less that 2 min left in the game.

    Yes, the defense gave up a shit ton of points, but damn…Fields just collapsed in the 4th quarter and helped is team lose.

    So no, I do not think the average you put up show an accurate picture of who Fields is as a QB. This is why his W/L record actually matters.




    1. Winning is good…Bear Down!

    2. I would rather be the Bears today than the Vikings

    3. Fields is not the guy… 200 yards, zero TDs, 3 sacks and 2 fumbles…this is not quality, especially when the D spots you 4 extra possessions.

    4. The D is coming together. Pressure, sacks, INT, run stopping.

    5. Penalties…70 yards, is just a potential game killer.

    6. The Bears have a lot of pieces, and some units are starting to work well together, but I don’t think they have the leaders to pull it together, especially on offense. Something isn’t working with Fields and Getsy, but both seem unable to adjust to put together anything resembling a competent NFL offense. Flus seems unable to solve this problem, so he needs to go also.






  • This. They won in spite of Fields, not because of him. He was about as good as a backup QB, servicable.

    I feel like folks are grading Fields on a curve because they really want him to do well, but damn. IF 200 yards, zero TDs, 3 sacks and 2 fumbles is your idea of quality QB play, then we need to adjust expectations. If this was KC, or Buffalo, Philly or San Fran…no way is this seen as acceptable play.