I mean, Tyler is clearly a very skilled and talented player and as an individual talent prob the 3d best guy on the team - though I noticed the team generally has better flow without him on the court. Is it just a coincidence? Or does his style not compliment the team?

Its a conflicting topic to talk about cause Herro is unquestionably a really skilled and talented player. Excellent scorer, okay playmaker and defensively, while he isn’t good, he isn’t horrible. Though I do wonder if he’s worth moving (not for Zach Lavine, who’s a slightly better scorer but probably worse in every other aspect of the game)

  • DametimeinmiamiB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We also didn’t have Caleb martin should we just trade herro and martin 🥴

  • PT0223B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another clown suggesting this team is better off without Tyler

  • cl353B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    we started getting healthy and playing easier teams. just look at the first quarter against the spurs, we scored 7 points in 7 minutes. something that doesnt happen with herro

  • UncoolAnonB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bruh, it’s the start of the season and new players/ rotations. We stand behind Tyler Herro as he brings us to the promised land!!!

  • VerumsemperB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The issue is not HERRO!! It is the defense. 1st they were winning with Herro 2nd. Switching Highsmith for love improved their defense. 3rd. Unleashing Duncan has added size to the starting back court. Spo has to really consider benching Lowery and starting Herro and Duncan now, given Duncan improved Defense.