To be clear: I am NOT in favor of doing this. I just think, depending on where they are picking, who is available, and who is running the draft there is are several very real scenarios where they could convince themselves that it makes sense. Even if Belichick is out when the draft rolls around, are we SURE that whoever the GM is will be able to pass on some deal similar to what the Bears got last year?

Consider this scenario: Patriots are sitting there at #3. Williams goes #1, MHJ goes #2… and a team like Arizona comes along and offers pick #5-7, a 1st next year and a legit player, say like a Budda Baker. Or maybe they offer something even crazier like #5-7, a 3rd, and Kyler Murray. Might be hard to pass up on a deal like that given how many needs the team has, especially if it’s a situation where they’re getting a whole lot in return just for moving down a few spots in the draft.

Again, I’m not advocating for this, I’m just saying that I do think it’s a real possibility and am wondering: would you be upset if they passed on a top 3 pick? Is there another trade scenario you can think of that would make you consider doing this?

  • XRT28B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we trade back it has to be for a haul and preferably draft picks not players. Unless they are either actually a position of need, good, healthy and on their rookie deals or are just “free with purchase.”

    Like I’m not really interested in cornerstone pieces of the deal being reclamation projects like Lance, Love or Fields. I’m not interested in taking on someone who is 27+ who is already going to be starting to decline by the time we’re done rebuilding and I’m not interested in someone with a massive contract or with serious injury concerns.