Hello everyone - I have been wanting to ditch windows on my gaming pc for a while now, and since I have recently finished a large project, I now have the free time to switch. I am relatively comfortable with Debian having used it for a while on my web server as well as school laptop, but I am concerned about using it on my gaming computer since I have heard stock Debian is not the greatest for gaming. All of my other daily driver programs I know will work, so I am mainly concerned with the gaming aspect.

In the case that you don’t recommend Debian for my gaming computer, do you have an OS that you would recommend?

I appreciate any insight!

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      10·
      11 months ago

      Pop OS works great for me. I’ve done a lot of testing with my steam (and other ) games. I’ve gotten 95% to work, most without a lot of effort. Proton db helps

      • Stillhart@lemm.ee
        6·
        11 months ago

        Ditto. I swapped to linux this summer and landed on Pop!_OS because my laptop has hybrid Nvidia graphics. Pop supports that really well because the company that makes Pop sells laptops with similar hybrid Nvidia graphics.

        So far almost every game I’ve tried on Pop has worked with no issue. Of the games that have had issues, EVERY ONE got working with the help of Proton db. (Note: All Steam games or games with native linux support.)

        Anyways, yeah I’m really not the biggest fan of Pop’s desktop environment, but it work really well for gaming so I’m leaving well enough alone.

  • bitrate@lemmy.world
    10·
    11 months ago

    I’m in a similar boat as you and my current plan is to switch to PopOS. They are Ubuntu/Debian based so you will be familiar with it, and they also are a distro that is more focused on gaming, so you will have an easier time with video card drivers.

    • Bizarroland@kbin.social
      2·
      11 months ago

      The only issue that I have with pop OS is that it seems unnecessarily slow at times.

      I’m running a Lenovo legion 5 with a 10750x, 32 gigs of ram, and a 2060 in it and sometimes it would feel a full second between when I click the button and when something happens.

      Fedora was a little bit better about that, but I don’t use that because of the weird politics surrounding Fedora right now.

      Now I’m on a mint cinnamon and it’s actually pretty good, although I have yet to try playing any games from steam on it.

      The other issues I have is that Fedora would keep my Bluetooth speakers connected between reboots but both pop OS and Linux cinnamon require that I manually reconnect every time.

    • LifeCoffeeGaming@lemmy.world
      1·
      11 months ago

      I was in a similar boat to you, but then I installed pop and just gave it a go. Stuck it on a separate hd for now but with everything setup and working I’m very happy with it.

  • xarexyouxmadx@lemmy.world
    9·
    11 months ago

    IMO it’s not that Debian isn’t good for gaming. It’s that it’s not good for gaming IF you want to just install Debian and start gaming right away. There’s going to be a bit of downloading/installing, & configuring first.

    If Debian is too far back of a starting point for you then I’d either go with a gaming distro where many things will already come installed and possibly (idk for sure because I’ve not used any gaming distros) configured for you to where you mostly just need to sign in and download your games.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    101·
    11 months ago

    I switched from arch to Debian bookworm for my work/gaming pc, and I have no regrets. Same amount of time setting up as arch, because of the newer kernel on bookworm you don’t have many prerequisites to install. Was gaming within an hour or two. That was six months ago, and things don’t break all the time like arch, where they would fix graphics drivers, but doing so would bork the sound. I play everything from factorio to cyberpunk, no issues. Only thing I can not get running for the life of me on windows or Linux is forza motorsports.

    I don’t think distro matters as much anymore with modern Linux. There are enough tutorials out there on most of them, should be easy to get setup on almost anything.

    • arthur@lemmy.zipEnglish
      3·
      11 months ago

      From Arch to Debian, that’s a 180° on stability. But to be honest, I’m using arch for 2 months now and everything seems very stable. I had no problems, yet.

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        4·
        11 months ago

        I never had an issue with system stability with Arch. It was just tiring every day making sure everything was up to date. Updates would break little things, like audio or some wine dependencies and I would just have to deal till I ran updates the next day. Meanwhile with Debian, the only issue I have ran into was with lutris and battle.net, and that turned out to just be a problem with mangohud.

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    71·
    11 months ago

    “not the greatest at gaming” is still perfectly fine – the main argument against Debian stable (at least for gamers) is that, since Debian’s focus is on stability, they’re not riding the bleeding edge of updates and features

  • rem26_art@kbin.social
    82·
    11 months ago

    Idk how well Debian stable would work, but Debian Sid might be a bit easier to work with in terms of games with it being more on the bleeding edge.

    There’s also Linux Mint Debian if you want to stay in the Debian universe, but you’d get more of the ease of use of Mint.

    Me personally, I’m using Fedora for gaming and I haven’t really had many issues with it. If you’re feeling adventurous, you could try Fedora or Nobara, which is a more gaming focused spinoff of Fedora

  • AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world
    3·
    11 months ago

    Fedora Silverblue and Linux Mint Debian Edition are my goto distros atm. Have not had issues with either, they’ve been great out of the box. Fedora Silverblue requires relearning a few things however, being very container oriented.

      • Marduk73@sh.itjust.works
        3·
        11 months ago

        i went cold turkey when i got that early, free upgrade from win7 to win 10. after a week of win 10 and unable to downgrade back to 7. Bam. i became full time linux at that moment.

  • Presi300@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    11 months ago

    Debian is fine, but not that great if you wanna game, it’s packages are kinda old and that matters a lot of you wanna game on linux, as the scene is rapidly evolving, even as we speak. It will work, you just might have issues with certain packages being to old and games not running as well as they should… If you want a gaming 1st distro, try nobara or something with newer packages, like EndeavorOS.

    Another thing that matters a lot when it comes to gaming on linux is the desktop environment and display server. It’s a big topic and I’m gonna get hated on, no matter what I recommend here, but my personal recommendation is to use the KDE Plasma desktop with the Wayland session. Again, it’s a big topic and you should look up the pros and cons of using Wayland or X11 for gaming, I recommend using Wayland to avoid certain headaches with X11 and to have a generally more usable system while gaming…

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    2·
    11 months ago

    I was daily driving arch for 5 years and decided to switch two months ago just like you now and running Debian 12 happily, tried fedora, set subvolumes to timeshift btrfs to work because it was not installed out of the box, and after update from 38 to 39 with official gui update tool, it broke and locked away ssd so i had to recover data, after that i installed Debian 12 and had no problems at all, machine ALWAYS ready to work and stable as fuck, heavenly experience so far actually

  • c10l@lemmy.world
    1·
    11 months ago

    I’m using Debian testing + a few packages from experimental (Mesa) and xanmod or liquorix kernel.

    It’s been a great experience. Stable as expected, performant as anything else.

    • deepdive@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      You probably have your reason to run Debian testing but I read somewhere that testing is somehow a bad idea as desktop environment !

      If somehing is stuck and being updated in sid, and bugs are still happening, you could be stuck for month without the correct update in testing.

      Sorry if it’s not clear, but I read it somewhere in the official debian documentation.

      • Cpo@lemm.ee
        2·
        11 months ago

        Debian testing is insanely robust. I am currently not running it (testing) because I use it for work, but my past experience has been excellent.

      • c10l@lemmy.world
        2·
        11 months ago

        Hey, I appreciate your warning.

        For a bit of context, I have been a Debian user for almost 30 years now. Mostly using testing for desktop / workstation systems, and stable on servers and containers. Debian is comfortable and provides me with stability where I need and cutting-edge where I want. It mostly “just works” with great defaults for everything, and it’s easy to customise where I desire.

        With that out of the way: you’re not wrong. In fact, the testing FAQ describes situations where these kinds of breakages could happen.

        That said, this is exceedingly rare if not nearly unheard of, and I can always pull packages from sid or experimental if I need (like I do Mesa).

        Edit to add: for anyone interested in trying out Debian testing, please check out the Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting

        Edit 2: I have published a blog post describing my setup if you’re interested: https://blog.c10l.cc/09122023-debian-gaming

        • deepdive@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          11 months ago

          Thank you for your insights and personal experiences :) I love Debian stable as server, never had any issues on a old Asus laptop ! I have only 2 years of “experience” and started with Ubuntu. Good introduction to linux but switched to Debian (<3)

          That’s way I’m asking arround I don’t wan’t to have a too bad experience with Debian as main personal PC !

          Thank you for your personal blog post and the wiki link :) will surely read through before making my final choice !

          • c10l@lemmy.world
            1·
            11 months ago

            No worries! I also posted the blog on this community (https://lemmy.world/post/9543661) and someone mentioned in the comments they’re running Debian stable for gaming.

            That can also be an option if you’d like to avoid testing for the minute, though I’m not sure what pitfalls that setup might have.

            Good luck on your journey!

      • OkeyDokey@lemmy.caEnglish
        1·
        11 months ago

        My desktop has been Debian testing since Jessie. I was inconvenienced a total of 2 times where something broke and made an app unuseable. My KDE menu was fixed within a day and my torrenting app took longer to fix, but I was able to apply a one line fix in the meantime with help from our awesome community.

        I know it’s named “testing”, but I’d bet it would be very stable for most people’s use cases and trade off is absolutely worth it if people would give it a try.

        • deepdive@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          11 months ago

          Do you consider testing a better choice than sid for desktop/gaming environment?

          I’m really not sure which one I should use. I only have experience with bare bone debian stable as server, I’m trying to find the best choice when switching from windaube to debian :)

          Thanks for your insights and personal experiences !

          • OkeyDokey@lemmy.ca
            2·
            11 months ago

            Sorry for the late reply. Yes, I think it’s better for desktop. Stable is truly targetted for servers and desktop users will only be mildy inconvenienced once in a blue moon.

          • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
            1·
            11 months ago

            To answer that, you must understand how testing works. Packages first are updated in Sid (unstable), then they go to Testing. At a certain point of the release cycle, Testing stops being updated to become the new Stable version. So basically Testing is not constantly updated. Also, security patches don’t follow this route: instead, they arrive in Sid first (thanks to the maintainers themselves) and then they get into Stable first (by the Debian team) because Stable has the priority. Only after that, they arrive in Testing.

            Also see this paragraph from the Debian Wiki regarding security:

            Security for testing benefits from the security efforts of the entire project for unstable. However, there is a minimum two-day migration delay, and sometimes security fixes can be held up by transitions. The Security Team helps to move along those transitions holding back important security uploads, but this is not always possible and delays may occur. Especially in the months after a new stable release, when many new versions are uploaded to unstable, security fixes for testing may lag behind.

            Also:

            Compared to stable and unstable, next-stable testing has the worst security update speed. Don’t prefer testing if security is a concern.

            My advice to everyone who wants Debian to be more current is to just run Sid (unstable). It’s always going to be more secure and up-to date than Testing. Also, it works like a rolling-release distro, i.e. the updates are incremental and constant

            EDIT: whatever you do, read and follow this guide. apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges especially will save your ass constantly

            • deepdive@lemmy.worldEnglish
              2·
              11 months ago

              Thank you for your nice write up and your link ! I think I will follow your guts and personal experiences ! Thank your for pre-saving my ass !! <3

  • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    1·
    11 months ago

    Late to the thread but I would say yeah, Debian is good for gaming. The only place I have issued is with VR, otherwise it’s been smooth sailing for the past 3 years.