qaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoStandards shouldn't be behind a paywalllemmy.worldimagemessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1664arrow-down134file-text
arrow-up1630arrow-down1imageStandards shouldn't be behind a paywalllemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square102fedilinkfile-text
ISO 8601 is paywalled RFC allows a space instead of a T (e.g. 2020-12-09 16:09:…) which is nicer to read.
minus-squaretreadful@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·11 months agoISO 8601 also allows for some weird shit. Like 2023-W01-1 which actually means 2022-12-31. There’s a lot of cruft in that standard.
minus-squareEnderMB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·11 months agoThis is the killer for me. Most people promote ISO 8601 as a “definitive” date structure, when it actually supports a lot of different formats. What they actually want is usually RFC 3339.
minus-squarebaltakatei@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoWeek numbers are convenient for projects in which key delivery dates are often expressed in his many weeks out they are.
minus-squarepomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agowtf what is that gross
ISO 8601 also allows for some weird shit. Like
2023-W01-1which actually means2022-12-31. There’s a lot of cruft in that standard.This is the killer for me. Most people promote ISO 8601 as a “definitive” date structure, when it actually supports a lot of different formats. What they actually want is usually RFC 3339.
Week numbers are convenient for projects in which key delivery dates are often expressed in his many weeks out they are.
wtf what is that gross