Next up: Could SteamOS 3 be coming to a desktop gaming rig near you?
    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      141·
      10 months ago

      He doesn’t want to let us use his comment for commercial purposes, which is a shame. I don’t know how I’m going to pay for dinner now.

      • PlantObserver@lemmy.world
        7·
        10 months ago

        You joke but when “media” outlets boldly steal 90% of their content directly from reddit posts and comments without attribution for commercial use, maybe including a license isnt crazy anymore?

        • Abnorc@lemm.ee
          2·
          10 months ago

          It’s a bit out there, but I see why he does it. It is a shame that the media has sunk to such lows.

    • 0x69@lemmy.world
      5·
      10 months ago

      Christ your comment is the funniest thing I’ve read in a while. Thank you for the laugh

    • dan@upvote.au
      41·
      10 months ago

      My comment is licensed under GPL. If you look at it when you reply, it means your reply is a derivative work and must retain the license. Have fun.

      • Womble@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think linking to a licence that increases the rights of third parties to do things with your words (over the default all rights reserved) will do very much for you there.

          • Womble@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            I think you’re missing my point. You are giving people more rights to use your comments by putting them under CC licence than not putting them under any.

              • Womble@lemmy.worldEnglish
                21·
                10 months ago

                No, how was I supposed to infer that you were fine with non-commercial AI from your two letter response to why you were licencing your comment?

                I think its fairly naive to think that linking to a licence will do anything to stop commercial AI but not open ones, but you go for it if you think it’s worthwhile.