Hi!

I have an HP 360 which has a touch screen and I never found a DE that is great for both regular input and touch input.

Kde is great for regular stuff but meh with touch, gnome is the other way around.

I was thinking of trying out hyperland but didn’t look into it’s touch compitability.

Any suggestions?

I use arch btw.

  • Zetta@mander.xyz
    343·
    10 months ago

    Gnome 100%. I personally like gnome for mouse and keyboard use but it’s really a no brainer for touch screen use.

  • Lunya \ she/it@iusearchlinux.fyi
    16·
    10 months ago

    Currently most likely GNOME, maybe KDE 6 in a month.

    Gestures feel nice on Hyprland, but to my knowledge there’s only a workspace swipe gesture by default. Also note that it’s not a DE.

      • Lunya \ she/it@iusearchlinux.fyi
        3·
        10 months ago

        It’s a tiling window manager, like i3 or bspwm.

        You have to pick out all the software (terminal, filemanager, text editor, whatever else a DE provides idk, but also things like a panel or launcher) yourself. Easy choices for that are KDE software (Konsole, Dolphin, Kate, etc), waybar, and rofi-wayland.

        It also doesn’t have a settings application (unless you use the very WIP and pretty outdated hyprset), all the configuration is in a file.

  • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    3·
    10 months ago

    Honestly, I tried Plasma on my friend’s 2-in-1 laptop and it’s pretty great with gestures and touch. I haven’t tried gnome but I can definitely recommend plasma.

  • jan teli@lemmy.world
    41·
    10 months ago

    Definitely gnome wayland. I have tried plasma wayland but it didn’t work as well (gnome apps seem to be more touch-friendly than qt ones) and there’s no built-in virtual keyboard. I also tried a custom setup with sway, wofi, wvkbd, wlogout, and some other stuff but it kinda sucked for touch.

  • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    32·
    10 months ago

    I would say plasma, Gnome has too many stupid issues for it to be a real contender IMO. I constantly found gnome to be laggy on my chuwi, even to the point that it would occasionally drop inputs.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      31·
      10 months ago

      GNOME is built for touch. if I rotate my HP laptop 90 degrees sideways, GNOME automatically rotates the screen to suit. Its why latest gnome has so many multifinger touch gestures for interacting with screen

      • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        31·
        10 months ago

        Gnome might be built for touch, but that doesn’t make it a great experience. Also KDE automatically rotates for me too.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          2·
          10 months ago

          I found the opposite, KDE felt Janky, GNOME is a cohesive experience built specific for touch gestures, tablet use etc

      • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        2·
        10 months ago

        off the top of my head,

        1. Performance of gnome isn’t great I often find it laggy on my lower end devices.

        2. Configuring gnome requires two separate GUI apps, and then you still may need cli.

        3. Gnome apps like nautilus, the file browser are also absurdly slow, sometimes taking more then 4 seconds for me (and others see here https://medium.com/@fulalas/gnome-mess-is-not-an-accident-4e301032670c) to load thumbnails.

        4. I found gestures to be inconsistent on my Chuwi hi10x too. They often times wouldn’t work and I would need to try multiple times.

        I did have other issues, but I didn’t exactly log them.

  • ikidd@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    I can’t stand using Gnome, but it is the only one that’s vaguely touch friendly. If you pile enough extensions in there, it becomes usable. Plasma has always been a disaster for me on tablets. Maybe 6 will be better, but I’m not holding my breath.