Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.
What would you change?
Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.
What would you change?
honestly canonical has always been like this.
what do you suggest for an alternative thats similar to ubuntu?
There where Times when Ubuntu was Marks baby, but nowadays with pro, advertisement and tracking in the terminal an AppStore, everything has to have a businesscase.
I would recommend just plain Debian either with flatpak or in the testing branch. It’s almost the same, stable as a rock and driven by a community.
if i understand correctly the testing branch is similar to ubuntu non-lts?
Somewhat but it is a rolling release. Packages will be major-updated constantly.
is it stable?
Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.
If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)
thats precisely my problem with debian stable, but id be ok with testing if it doesnt break unpredictably with regular updates.
On my side it’s running since years without problems. I would never use arch on a business workstation with debian testing I see no problems at all.
then i might as well just test it