• magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          2·
          2 months ago

          there is plenty of non-quantized instrumental music if you’re willing to look, and even then dismissing all music doesn’t forego a strict grid (which in the modern day is simply a choice and artist can choose to make) is dismissing a massive body of work just because it doesn’t use a technique that you like

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.worldEnglish
            3·
            2 months ago

            Dude/Dudette, it was just a gag comment. Not only am I not really dismissing a massive body of work just because it uses quantization, as someone who’s spent more than half his life writing software synthesis applications, I’ve literally made a career out of quantization.

            That being said, music that is not quantized definitely has a more natural feel to it, although putting that “feel” into sequencing software is surprisingly difficult.

            • ulterno@lemmy.kde.socialEnglish
              0·
              2 months ago

              As a treble lover, I tend to have problems with low bitrate and lossily compressed stuff.
              But from what I have seen heard, as long as the quanta are fine enough, the resultant regenerated audio tends to be close enough to the original. Of course, the components of the sound card matter, when you get to extreme clarity levels, but I guess my ears are not fine enough for that.

    • debil@lemmy.world
      51·
      2 months ago

      Just ignore that crap and put some real shit into your headphones. Like The Cramps - Songs The Lord Taught Us.

      Play it loaded.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        3·
        2 months ago

        I just love this kind of personal recommendation instead of the same shit Spotify and every streaming/scrobbling service keeps recommending. Sure I will, thank you.

    • magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      41·
      2 months ago

      this kind of comment just reminds me of how people used to complain about distortion on electric guitars when it was initially discovered/invented/popularized

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        1·
        2 months ago

        For me, your comparison falls short in the sense that electric guitar distortions actually amplified the audio resources musicians had to express ideas and textures. Autotune was initially a tool that also did enhance the set of tools musicians had before it appeared, however, the lack of creative uses compared to the amount of use it gets in the industry, makes it a trope to my ears. Autotune feels like a Marvel Comics hero movie at this point.

  • Fox@pawb.social
    29·
    2 months ago

    What’s interesting is just how different the quality was of some of the stereo releases vs the mono bounces. For an example, the stereo HDCD version of Pet Sounds is a little wack, but even if you joined the two channels to mono it sounds a hundred times better than the shittastic mono release. Got to wonder if they optimized it for AM radio play the way that similarly awful sounding releases in the early 2000s optimized for iPod earbuds.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      2·
      2 months ago

      This is why, when it comes to old music, I always try to listen to it the way it was originally intended.

      Pet Sounds, as beautiful as it is, was originally released in mono. It was mastered to be listened to in mono, at a time when stereo was mostly just a novelty.

      It wasn’t until much more recently that they’ve taken those masters and created “real” stereo mixes from them. While they can often sound pretty good, they never quite reach the level of the best sounding mono mixes of the same material.

      Just my opinion of course.

      • Fox@pawb.social
        2·
        2 months ago

        That may be a thing with some releases, but I’m convinced that the original pet sounds and even the MFSL mono release are very inferior to that one HDCD stereo release. Still I’m listening to in 16bit/44kHz form, but to me it sounds way higher fidelity and likely is closer to the source. I can pick out instruments and sounds that I didn’t hear in the other version.

        In general though I find modern ‘remasters’ are horrible and compressed and I think it’s lame that services like Spotify usually have only the most recent (and therefore worst) version of a given album.

        May the source be with you

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        11·
        2 months ago

        00s music sounds so shitty because that was when digital music first became a thing. People thought 128kbps bitrate MP3s were acceptable (until they hear that mp3 they got from KaZaa play over the PA at their wedding and realize it sounds like raccoons fighting in a trashcan).

          • Fox@pawb.social
            3·
            2 months ago

            I think it’s the tendency of producers in that era, around 2000-2010 was peak Loudness War, and many albums were pushed into clipping. IMO it started getting better through the 2010s as the emphasis on radio charts started to wane and listening habits shifted away from earbuds and portables.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    26·
    2 months ago

    It was the early days of a new technology and way of listening that was completely different compared to the past 60+ years of recorded audio. I guess as a more modern analogy it’s like those cheap 3D films at the height of the fad that felt the need to gratuitously shove objects directly in front of the camera to get the most out of the 3D effect.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      71·
      2 months ago

      Those were the better 3d movies because they at least felt like there was depth. Unlike those modern movies.

    • Hammocks4All@lemmy.mlOP
      9·
      2 months ago

      Incredible. I’m learning a ton and gaining a huge appreciation of it all thanks to everyone’s comments in this post.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    12·
    2 months ago

    It was designed to show off stereo sound which was still fairly new at the time. I like the way those recordings sound actually.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    12·
    2 months ago

    I believe that they had stereo mixing pretty figured out by the 70s…

    Early-mid 60s though? Sure.

    Unless you’re referring to when they started mixing mono albums into stereo, then yeah. Those albums were never meant to be listened in stereo, and I wouldn’t listen to a remaster of any of them unless they were officially approved by the band, or done by the band’s own producer. And even then…

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      It’s like motion controls. Nintendo came out with the Wii, motion controls were a huge goddamn fad for a few years, and now 2 of the 3 main console manufacturers put a gyro in their controllers which might be used for fine aiming control and that’s about it.

  • Tabooki@lemmy.world
    135·
    2 months ago

    Today’s music is digitally mixed on laptops and has zero dynamic range or feeling. Then again people listen on Bluetooth now so they are only getting 20% of the music anyways. Makes me very sad

    • mlg@lemmy.worldEnglish
      101·
      2 months ago

      2024 I finally tried some Bluetooth headphones after maybe 10+ years.

      Still using SBC by default, still no duplex HD audio, and still static driver noise at idle.

      What is even the point lol. SBC-XQ only solves the first problem which is still inferior to even the cheapest of quality 3.5mm cable.

      Even my Nintendo DS sounds better and it’s limited to 32Khz audio lol.

      • HandMadeArtisanRobot@lemmy.worldEnglish
        51·
        2 months ago

        Jeez, were one of the two devices 10 years old? That hasn’t been my experience for a long time (except the duplex audio issue. I can’t believe it’s still terrible.)

        Then again, I mostly use BT for the convenience. Being able to do yard work with zero wires is amazing.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    91·
    2 months ago

    The early days of stereo (which is what you’re talking about, the recordings of 70s which aren’t using stereo as an “effect” almost universally have the vocals panned to the center. The old way to take the vocals out of a recording was to adjust how much of the signal present equally on both channels was allowed to be played) were all about two things: backwards compatibility with mono systems and giving people with stereo systems a recognizable effect no matter what goofy system they had.

    Wild panning accomplishes both goals.

    Studio engineering that used the stereo format to create the illusion of a room or capture the sound of the room the players were playing in wasn’t developed yet and came from the experimental stereo recordings that sound crazy now like silver apples of the moon.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    7·
    2 months ago

    My dad had some albums, maybe Mike Oldfield or others…there was a train going through a station, and hearing it pass from left to right in stereo was amazing at the time

  • Orbituary@lemmy.worldEnglish
    62·
    2 months ago

    There’s actually a biological reason for this, believe it or not. Language and music “time share” many characteristics of both hemispheres of the brain. Language and music are processed in different hemispheres.

    Read pages 20-26 of the book “How Music Really Works” by Wayne Chase. It breaks it down in detail.