• 5 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2023

help-circle



  • I think it’s a really nifty device, but I can’t really stomach the price for my use case. I’m mostly at home, but occasionally drive out to events. At home if I already have a gaming PC, I don’t see myself using the SD. I mean you could lay down while gaming which is true, but I don’t mind sitting especially if it saves me a couple hundred bucks.

    Again, I do think it’s an interesting device. I just think handhelds are stuck in this tug-of-war between portability, battery-life and power. The more you go towards one, the further away you are from the other. Either you go all the way portable with something like a Nintendo DS/3DS and you get a small size, plus decent battery life, but you just don’t have power. If you go towards raw power, the unit tends to be huge and you’re going to eat your battery like it’s a sample at Costco. You also have to turn settings to low to make it playable and you’re likely going to have to plug it into the wall, which defeats the point of being portable in the first place. You could dock them, but that then makes it pretty much a PC, so you could just get a PC.

    I think the SD’s best place is to play middleweight games - games that are more than the smaller ones which you could just play on a smaller portable, but less powerful than the AAA games on consoles/PC where you have to massively limit frames on the SD and where you’re battery life is dramatically reduced. As it is, I game pretty much on PC and carry a modded 3DS when I’m on the go if I want to busy myself with a smaller game while waiting somewhere.

    Again, I do think the SD is an amazing device that’s really cool; I’d get one over buying a PS5 or XSX. I just think it doesn’t make sense for my use case costing that much money. If I had money lying around then I could buy it to try it. I think SD is a very versatile device. I like how it’s basically a PC and can be used as one. You can output it onto a TV as well. I just feel in terms of raw gaming, my portable needs are met with a smaller device and raw gaming is just better on the PC/console in terms of performance and comfort. I’m fine with playing smaller titles on the go like Tetris or Mario. I don’t mind playing Starfield on my desktop and prefer to play it there where I have better FPS, a larger screen and a more comfortable controller.


  • It’s a painful one, but I’m not down and out. I think the right move is to create a system and not just live and die by isos. I feel like Batum and RoCo were great because they were part of a system in that they had defined roles of being 3 and D guys. I just don’t really see a system and see Russ, PG or Kawhi chucking balls and not utilizing their teammates.

    It sucks, but I’m not down and out. It’s more on our own issues than the Denver team being great.




  • AmuseDeathBtoLA Clippers@nba.spaceT Mann appreciation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought he was being traded for a sec 😅

    Yea, TMann is great. The thing is we have 4 dedicated scoring players, so we need other players to facilitate those guys and guys like TMann do this job well. TMann doesn’t look like he scores a lot and he doesn’t, but it’s to give room for the scorers. We can’t have everybody be offensively minded and need to create roles so people can focus on one task. I think non-scoring players are underrated and help the team in a lot of ways without the ball.









  • Probably all the damn turnovers. The ones from that 175-176 last year against SAC still burn. Other than that, I think this is an amazing squad. KL and PG are just boss, Zu is great at what he does, Russ has this explosive energy that helps out when 213 gets gassed, TM just feels so versatile from any position, Bones is such an amazing player for being so young, Norman can get really hot, RoCo has great defensive skills, etc.

    I might be wrong later, but I feel good about the squad.