People will still complain but game quality will be drastically different

After the ban patch, my games were so high quality. I was enjoying Dota like I’ve never had before. My teammates were nice and the games were fun. I also went on a 22 game win streak.

The decline match button has an “Info” icon which makes 0 sense

What do you expect from this company?

They only make arcanas for popular heroes, because they actually want these to sell well

They think the system is unfair and they are not at their real rank

As simple as that

Yup just a bunch of 200-300 wins players all playing carry or mid and magically stomping everyone.

System working as intended?

Stomped

It’s taking so long because they’re gonna surprise us with a Dota 3 update! /s

Better than pos5

I already text the support.

Now I’m wondering if you just messaged the fake Support account again

Not everything is about penises :)

I’ve have a 100% loss rate if the enemy team has a mid LD

He’s wearing other teams’ jerseys!

What will you have after 500 years?

I’ll still have Stout Shield, Ring of Aquila, Wraith Pact, Hand of Midas

I think the older heroes are just random spells. CM, Enigma have “themed” spells, like they just are the same color, but the spells aren’t really related.

If a 2023 player traveled back in time, they would lose. Most of their “knowledge” isn’t applicable to 2013 Dota.

Same with the Immortal player. Most of the knowledge and skills from back then wouldn’t apply here either.

One thing I’m surprised about is that Taiga seemingly never set up a company.

This was something Zai’s parents (in Sweden) did as soon as he became a pro. Prize winnings would go to the company for tax reasons. In Norway, for the same reasons, should have set up a company.

But also probably means if Zai were to have a gambling problem, it would be harder for him to randomly gamble it all away because the money is not as easy to access.

Pango is gonna get another nerf…

I can’t believe so many people are intentionally slow.

Yes, I said it’s normal. But it’s not players-first. If you want to empower players, you wouldn’t have contracts that are as restrictive as the industry standard.

He was on contract for a year meaning if he wanted to switch teams, he needed to be bought out.

This isn’t a bad thing, it’s normal, it’s orgs-first.

But you can’t say that is players-first.