all he cares about is 9-8

What does this even mean lol

I dont get it, he didn’t even do a spin

I think he’s saying that during away games, the staff on the field doesnt see any replay so they can’t make a good decision.

The question of couse is why they don’t have staff in the booth to handle this

Matt Canada, we know you’re reading this – you may be the worst OC of all time, but there is more to life than 400 yards and being liked by Jaylen Warren. Hang in there buddy

Antonio Brown, pre-implosion

Ok which one of you is Pickett’s QB coach

Oh cool we have OP’s IP address now

Tomlin hired an equipment manager from Maryland because the guy kept making his son’s least favorite gatorade flavor (Cool Blue) and Tomlin wanted him replaced.

He’s next in line for OC

I think I’d rather take OL first in back to back drafts.

It gives half credit for what happened.

Recency bias. Tomlin teams have blown opponents out of the water. Ben was taking deep shots all the time. We were throwing in scenarios where many teams would run.

It’s clear we’ve been very conservative on offense recently. It seems to be timed pretty well with the hiring of Canada and decline of Ben.

As fans we’re basically left to guess why this is happening. Is Tomlin crafting a conservative style for the entire organization? Is the OC calling only the conservative plays? Is Pickett making conservative decisions?

This post makes absolutely no sense, I can’t even formulate a response

Idk why people make fun of this. PFF sacks actually make sense. The current sack system is dumb.

If two edge rushers reach the QB at the same time, and either would have sacked the QB individually, why give them 0.5 each?

You’re punishing a player just because his teammate also did well?

Should be more like tackles where there’s solo and combined. That’s effectively what PFF is doing, summing up solo and combined sacks, instead of this dumb half point system.

Those are two football players, no doubt about that

The data shows this kind of performance is not likely to result in wins. That’s why it’s not sustainable.

It’s like flipping a coin and getting heads 6/9 times, then saying “is this strategy to keep getting heads sustainable?”

It doesn’t go back a decade – over the long term, Steelers are not unusual in their win-loss ratio for close games.

Us r/KevinDotson truthers knew this all along.

Not a dumb question

Assume you mean passing yards here? Offense has gone over 300 many times