One of the reasons women will find this repugnant is because they didn’t normalize their tables. Should be
boyfriend_id is null.Why is there a separate table for men and women in the first place? Shouldn’t there be a person table with a many to many relationship with itself (because polyamory exists)?
For that matter, why is waist size a Boolean?
They allowed business logic to pollute the DB table, and “small waist” is a defined range in some confluence doc somewhere.
And why is cuteness and craziness binary?
This is why we have codes of conduct.
I can already imagine a 40-something year old manager coming into work wearing this
most infurating part of this is the mixing of cases
I would reject this pull request. Why is the indenting all over the place? Why is your keyword capitalisation all over the place? WHY YELLOW?!
Edit: the more I look at this the more it pisses me off. Wtf is going on with your kerning? Just random number and placement of spaces. Also, why is the table name in caps? Who does that? Select * is lazy. Do you really need every field about a girl? Really? Worst of all, not a limited request. I sware this is just the kind of thing that would return 30 million rows and brick the database for twenty seconds.
You are now a Certified Rejector. Stay sharp, keep the wheel rolling.
I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
At least he’s wearing the red flag on the outside.
This is the most Indian shit I have seen this week.
