• no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like since that’s a very useful product it will not be made available to me.

    • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’ll be kept within product marketing and, I dunno how, but it would absolutely be used to see what they can raise prices on

  • BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    We really need to stop calling things “AI” like it’s an algorithm. There’s image recognition, collective intelligence, neural networks, path finding, and pattern recognition, sure, and they’ve all been called AI, but functionally they have almost nothing to do with each other.

    For computer scientists this year has been a sonofabitch to communicate through.

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      But “AI” is the umbrella term for all of them. What you said is the equivalent of saying:

      we really need to stop calling things “vehicles”. There’s cars, trucks, airplanes, submarines, and space shuttles and they’ve all been called vehicles, but functionally they have almost nothing to do with each other

      All of the things you’ve mentioned are correctly referred to as AI, and since most people do not understand the nuances of neural networks vs hard coded algorithms (and anything in-between), AI is an acceptable term for something that demonstrates results that comes about from a computer “thinking” and making shaved intelligent decisions.

      Btw, just about every image recognition system out there is a neural network itself or has a neural network in the processing chain.

      Edit: fixed an autocorrect typo

      • benignintervention@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        While this is true, I think of AI in the sci fi sense of a programmed machine intelligence rivaling human problem solving, communication, and opinion forming. Everything else to me is ML.

        But like Turing thought, how can we really tell the difference

        • Deuces@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          As far as taking scifi terms for real things, at least this one is somewhat close. I’m still pissed about hover boards. And Androids are right out!

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What you’re referring to in movies is properly known as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

          AI is correctly applied to systems that process in a “biologically similar” fashion. Basically something a human or “smart” animal could do. Things like object detection, natural language processing, facial recognition, etc, are things you can’t program (there’s more to facial recognition, but I’m simplifying for this discussion) and they need to be trained via a neural network. And that process is remarkably similar to how biological systems learn and work.

          Machine learning, on the other hand, are processes that are intelligent but are not intrinsically “human”. A good example is song recommendations. The more often you listen to a genre of music, the more likely you are to enjoy other songs in that genre. So a system can count the number of songs you listen to the most in a specific genre, and then recommend that genre more than others. Fairly straightforward to program and doesn’t require any training, yet it gets better the more you use it.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            How is my comment “gatekeeping” by any stretch of the defintion? I had one comment and the one making jest that you replied to. I only asked that there should be a catch all term and provided examples to go with it. How is that gatekeeping…?

            It’s more to due with social media tropes. Someone sees a downvoted comment and does the same without even reading.

            Edit and more proof it has nothing to do with the stuff you claimed, it’s now upvoted since the initial wave of people have stopped and people who care to read the meat of the comments now have and have established balance.

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I didn’t steal anything. When I posted my comment there were only two other comments in the whole thread.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I know, it’s just funny how two very similar thoughts can be be taking two different ways deepening on who sees it first and interacts with it.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re right, but so is the previous poster. Actual AI doesn’t exist yet, and when/if it does it’s going to confuse the hell out of people who don’t get the hype over something we’ve had for years.

        But calling things like machine learning algorithms “AI” definitely isn’t going away… we’ll probably just end up making a new term for it when it actually becomes a thing… “Digital Intelligence” or something. /shrug.

        • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It isn’t human-level, but you could argue it’s still intelligence of a sort, just erstatz

          • OpenStars@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I dunno… I’ve heard that argument, but when something gives you >1000 answers, among which the correct answer might be buried somewhere, and a human is paid to dig through it and return something that looks vaguely presentable, is that really “intelligence”, of any sort?

            Aka, 1 + 1 = 13, which is a real result that AI can and almost certainly has recently offer(ed).

            People are right to be excited about the potential that generative AI offers in the future, but we are far from that atm. Also it is vulnerable to misinformation presented in the training data - though some say that that process might even affect humans too (I know, you are shocked, right? well, hopefully not that shocked:-P).

            Oh wait, nevermind I take it all back: I forgot that Steven Huffman / Elon Musk / etc. exist, and if that is considered intelligence, then AI has definitely passed that level of Turing equivalence, so you’re absolutely right, erstatz it is, apparently!?

            • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              What’s the human digging through answers thing? I haven’t heard anything about that.

              • OpenStars@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                ChatGPT was caught, and I think later admitted, to not actually using fully automated processes to determine those answers, iirc. Instead, a real human would curate the answers first before they went out. That human might reject answers to a question like “Computer: what is 1+1?” ten times before finally accepting one of the given answers (“you’re mother”, hehe with improper apostrophe intact:-P). So really, when you were asking for an “AI answer”, what you were asking was another human on the other end of that conversation!!!

                Then again, I think that was a feature for an earlier version of the program, that might no longer be necessary? On the other hand, if they SAY that they aren’t using human curation, but that is also what they said earlier before they admitted that they had lied, do we really believe it? Watch any video of these “tech Bros” and it’s obvious in less than a minute - these people are slimy.

                And to some extent it doesn’t matter bc you can download some open source AI programs and run them yourself, but in general from what I understand, when people say things nowadays like “this was made from an AI”, it seems like it is always a hand-picked item from among the set of answers returned. So like, “oooh” and “aaaahhhhh” and all that, that such a thing could come from AI, but it’s not quite the same thing as simply asking a computer for an answer and it returning the correct answer right away! “1+1=?” giving the correct answer of 13 is MUCH less impressive when you find that out of a thousand attempts at asking, it was only returned a couple times. And the situation gets even worse(-r) when you find out that ChatGPT has been getting stupider(-est?) for awhile now - https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2023/07/ai-supposed-become-smarter-over-time-chatgpt-can-become-dumber/388826/.

                • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  So reading through your post and the article, I think you’re a bit confused about the “curated response” thing. I believe what they’re referring to is the user ability to give answers a “good answer” or “bad answer” flag that would then later be used for retraining. This could also explain the AIs drop in quality, of enough people are upvoting bad answers or downvoting good ones.

                  The article also describes “commanders” reviewing and having the code team be responsive to changing the algorithm. Again this isn’t picking responses for the AI. Instead ,it’s reviewing responses it’s given and deciding if they’re good or bad, and making changes to the algorithm to get more accurate answers in the future.

                  I have not heard anything like what you’re describing, with real people generating the responses real time for gpt users. I’m open to being wrong, though, if you have another article.

                • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  There’s no way that’s the case now, the answers are generated way too quickly for a human to formulate. I can certainly believe it did happen at one point.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          This problem was kinda solved by adding AGI term meaning “AI but not what is now AI, what we imagined AI to be”

          Not going to say that this helps with confusion much 😅 and to be fair, stuff like autocomplete in office soft was called AI long time ago but it was far from LLMs of now

        • reassure6869@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          we’ll just do the same shit we did with self driving (“that was just regular self driving, you can upgrade to self-driving-plus or ‘full’ self driving or self-driving extreme definitive edition”) or networking (“that was just regular 4g which was actually just slow 3g we lied to you about, so now we have to call it 4g lte even though everyone else just calls it 4g” - att).

        • Klear@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Enemies in Doom have AI. We’ve been calling simple algorythms in a handful lines of code AI for a long time, the trend has nothing to do with languege models etc.

      • BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not fighting, I’m just disgusted. As someone’s wise grandma once said, “[BoastfulDaedra], you are not the fuckface whisperer.”

    • OpenStars@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      AI = “magic”, or like “synergy” and other buzzwords that will soon become bereft of all meaning as a result of people abusing it.

    • d20bard@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Computer vision is AI. If they literally want a robot eye to scan their cluttered pantry and figure out what is there, that’ll require some hefty neural net.

      Edit: seeing these downvotes and surprised at the tech illiteracy on lemmy. I thought this was a better informed community. Look for computer vision papers in CVPR, IJCNN, and AAAI and try to tell me that being able to understand the 3D world isn’t AI.

      • BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re very wrong.

        Computer vision is scanning the differentials of an image and determining the statistical likelihood of two three-dimensional objects being the same base mesh from a different angle, then making a boolean decision on it. It requires a database, not a neutral net, though sometimes they are used.

        A neutral net is a tool used to compare an input sequence to previous reinforced sequences and determine a likely ideal output sequence based on its training. It can be applied, carefully, for computer vision. It usually actually isn’t to any significant extent; we were identifying faces from camera footage back in the 90s with no such element in sight. Computer vision is about differential geometry.

        • danielbln@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Computer vision deals with how computers can gain high level understanding of images and videos. It involves much more than just object reconstruction. And more importantly, neural networks are a core component is just about any computer vision application since deep learning took off in the 2010s. Most computer vision is powered by some convolutional neural network or another.

          Your comment contains several misconceptions and overlooks the critical role of neural networks, particularly CNNs, which are fundamental to most contemporary computer vision applications.

          • d20bard@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thanks, you saved me the trouble of writing out a rant. I wonder if the other guy is actually a computer scientist or just a programmer who got a CS degree. Imagine attending a CV track at AAAI or the whole of CVPR and then saying CV isn’t a sub field of AI.

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s whole countries that refer to the entire internet itself as Facebook, once something takes root it ain’t going anywhere

    • DudeBro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I imagine it’s because all of these technologies combine to make a sci-fi-esque computer assistant that talks to you, and most pop culture depictions of AI are just computer assistants that talk to you. The language already existed before the technology, it already took root before we got the chance to call it anything else.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Shouldn’t there be a catch all term to explain the broader scope of the specifics?

      Science is a broad term for multiple different studies, vehicle is a broad term for cars and trucks.

    • danielbln@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Language is fluid, and there is plenty of terminology that is dumb or imprecise to someone in the field, but A-ok to the wider populace. “Cloud” is also not actually a formation of water droplets, but someone’s else’s datacenter, but to some people the cloud is everything from Gmail to AWS.

      If I say AI today and most people associate the same thing with it (these days that usually means generative AI , i.e. mostly diffusion or transformer models) then that’s fine for me. Call it Plumbus for all I care.

      • reassure6869@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        cloud is just a marketing term for someone elses computer, so calling gmail the cloud is perfectly reasonable. Im not disagreeing with your overall point that commenter is ridiculous, but I can’t think of a worse example than cloud.

    • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Those are all very specific intelligences. The goal is to unite them all under a so-called general intelligence. You’re right, that’s the dream, but there are many steps along the way that are fairly called intelligence.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The bad news is the AI they’ll pay for will instead estimate your net worth and the highest price you’re likely to pay. They’ll then dynamicly change the price of things like groceries to make sure the price they’re charging will maximize their profits on any given day. That’s the AI you’re going to get.

  • BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Next, she’s going to want a Libre AI that does not share her information with third parties or suggest unnecessary changes to make her spend more at sponsored businesses.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    AI could do this. Conventional programming could do it faster and better, even if it was written by AI.

    It’s an important concept to grasp

    • theblueredditrefugee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cameras in your fridge and pantry to keep tabs on what you have, computer vision to take inventory, clustering to figure out which goods can be interchanged with which, language modeling applied to a web crawler to identify the best deals, and then some conventional code to aggregate the results into a shopping list

      Unless you’re assuming that you’re gonna be supplied APIs to all the grocery stores which have an incentive to prevent this sort of thing from happening, and also assuming that the end user is willing, able, and reliable enough to scan every barcode of everything they buy

      This app basically depends on all the best ai we already have except for image generation

      • Vegaprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Rolling this out for tools and parts at my work. Tool boxes with cameras in the drawers to make sure you put it back. Vending machines for parts with auto order.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Cameras and computer vision aren’t necessary. Food products already come with upcs. All you need is a barcode reader to input stuff and to track what you use in meals. Tracking what you use could also be used for meal planning.

        • theblueredditrefugee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, I did think of the barcode approach, but I didn’t think anyone would be willing to scan every item, which is why I ignored it

          However, revisiting this question made me realize that we could probably have the user scan receipts. It would take some doing but you could probably extract all the information from the receipt because it’s in a fairly predictable format, and it’s far less onerous.

          OTOH, you still have to scan barcodes every time you cook with something, and you’d probably want some sort of mechanism to track partial consumption and leftovers, though a minimum viable product could work without that

          The tough part, then, is scouring the internet for deals. Should be doable though.

          Might try to slap something together tonight or tomorrow for that first bit, seems pretty easy, I bet you’ve got open source libraries for handling barcodes, and scanning receipts can probably just be done with existing OCR tech, error correction using minimum edit distance, and a few if statements to figure out which is the quantity and which is the item. That is, if my adhd doesn’t cause me to forget

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            OTOH, you still have to scan barcodes every time you cook with something, and you’d probably want some sort of mechanism to track partial consumption and leftovers, though a minimum viable product could work without that

            If you can also keep recipes in the system you could skip scanning the barcodes here. You’d just need to input how many servings you prepared and any waste. Even if the “recipe” is just “hot pocket” or something. If the system knows how much is in a package it can deduct what you use from the total and add it to the list when you need more.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Tracking what you use would be a lot easier with AI. Then you wouldn’t have to keep a barcode scanner in the kitchen. You could just have a camera pointed at your food prep space

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            is AI good enough to manage that with just a camera? how would it determine how much of a given product you uses? Like if you dump a cup of flour in a bowel, how does it know how much that was.

            If you have to point the product in front of the camera to register it anyway, might as well use a barcode reader anyway because it’s the same thing at that point just without the risk of the AI misidentifying something.

      • Komatik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think you can achieve a similar result by having one giant DB so we can average out general consumption and then have a personal/family profile, where we in the first place manually feed the AI with data like, what did we bought, exp date, when did we partly or fully consume it. Although intensive at first I think AI will increasingly become more accurate whereby you will need to input less and less data as the data will be comming from both you and the rest of the users. The only thing that still needs to be input is “did you replace it ?”

        This way we don’t need cameras

        • theblueredditrefugee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, so you’re saying that the only data the algorithm needs in the limit is whether or not the user deviated from the generated shopping list, and if so, how, right?

          This is true, it’s just a bit difficult to cross the gap from here to there

          • Komatik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sure no problem, I just need you to puch in some data manually so we can get started. Can you get thid stack done by tomorrow? Awesome, see you tomorrow!

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m sure there are companies who’d love to develop something like this. And collect that information about exactly what groceries you currently have and statistics of how you consume them, so they can sell it to advertisers. Not advertisers that sell these groceries, of course - for these the AI company could just make the AI buy them from suppliers that pay them.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      They already exist and have been doing this for a long time, they are just using dumber versions of deep learning than what we have right now.

      Less about giving your personal information to an advertiser though and more about using aggregate data trends to guide marketing efforts.

      Like if you know buns and hotdogs sell like crazy the week before July 4th merchandizing bundles of both that override brand purchase intent on favor of convenience and discount.

      An example of this kind of market research in action would be a clothes store that knows 20% of its sales were to people who shopped the day before they came back to buy offering 48hr exit coupons that would be valid the next day for a limited time.

      The personalized data is used in house at these aggregators to market to you directly, such as the war and peace length personalized coupons on receipts where they’ve been contracted by the retailers.

    • danciestlobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not just advertisers, it would also get sold to food manufacturers and product developers. This is not so bad though cause it helps new products come out that might be in line with what you want

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is what “loyalty” cards are for. They give you a little discount in exchange for being able to track your purchases.

    • jivemasta@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, when that xkcd was made, that was a hard task. Now identifying a bird in a picture can be done in realtime on a raspberry pi in a weekend project.

      The problem in the op isn’t really a limitation of AI, it’s coming up with an inventory management system that can detect low inventory without being obtrusive in a users life. The rest is just scraping local stores prices and compiling a list with some annealing algo that gets the best price to stops ratio.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I see this complaint everywhere. People mentioning business setting prices to maximize profits, like it’s a bad thing.

          In a market with competition, that maximum profit point is also the point of maximum value to the consumer. Because business is a negotiation, not a dictatorial relationship.

          I don’t understand why people don’t understand this.

      • IndefiniteBen@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think you focused too much on the details…

        AI image manipulation is entirely based in a computer where an image is processed by an algorithm. Grocerybot involves many different systems and crosses the boundary between digital and physical. The intertwined nature of the complexity is what makes it (relatively) difficult to explain.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I want AI to control traffic lights so that I don’t sit stopped through an entire cycle as the only car in a 1 mile radius. Also, if there is just one more car in line, let the light stay green just a couple seconds longer. Imagine the gas and time that could be saved… and frustration.

          • IndefiniteBen@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            How do I make it sound like that? You first need to build traffic light and road infrastructure that can handle advanced traffic flow, along with the processing power to make decisions based on sensor readings and rules.

            The software (AI is kinda overkill) exists to handle and optimise traffic flow over an entire city, but your software does not matter if there are insufficient sensors for the software to make decisions, or too few controllable lights to implement decisions (or both).

          • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            What they’re saying is if money was adequately invested in infrastructure, these old systems would have been upgraded 10 or 20 years ago and AI would not be necessary at all.

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank goodness. until every intersection becomes this intuitive, I will only continually notice the ones that hold me hostage through several cycles and /or don’t even notice I’m there waiting at a red light for 5 minutes at 3am when I’m the only car there.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      Doesn’t need AI, and there are countries that already have a system in place with the same result. Unsurprisingly the places with more focus on pedestrian, cyclist, and public transit infrastructure have the most enjoyable driving experience. All the people that don’t want to drive will stop as soon as it is safe and convenient, and all those cars off the road also help with this because the lights will be queued up with fewer cars.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Unfortunately, the US is king of the suburbs and I don’t see that changing any time soon.

        I know you don’t need AI to do this but I think AI would do a great job if properly employed.

    • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      To be fair, there are already more intelligent traffic light systems that use sensors in the road to see if there is traffic sitting at the lights, combined with push buttons for pedestrians and cyclists. These can be combined with sensors further up the road to see if more traffic is coming and extend the periods of green light for certain sides. It may not be perfect and it may require touching up later after seeing which times could be extended or shortened. It’s not AI but it works a lot better than the old hard coded traffic lights. Here in the Netherlands there are only a handfull of intersections left that still have the hard coded traffic lights.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not near me. I can’t speak to the entire US, but everywhere I’ve been, it’s horrible. In Germany they have a green wave, where all of the lights are green if you go the speed limit. I have only encountered this twice within 200 miles of where I live.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You and Sarah Radz and everyone else here with brilliant practical ideas need to submit your resumes to the Silicon-Valley-esque corporations that comandeer such industries, be hired on as brains.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank you for the kindness. At least I think it’s kind. I don’t know who Sarah Radz is. So I choose to accept this as a compliment.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That would be great, but it’s just not practical in many places.

        I looked up how to get to work using public transportation once. It was 3 hours using 3 busses and a half hour walk. LOL. I could literally do it in two hours using a bike. But I’m just not willing to spend 4 hours a day getting to work and back. I don’t know many that would of they had a choice. It’s half an hour drive for me, but 22 miles, mostly interstate.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not that I can’t fathom how it could be better, I literally wish I could get rid of my car.

          I literally can’t. I live far enough away from my job that not having a car to get there every day isn’t an option, I can’t move close enough to my job to eliminate a car, and even if I did, I’m only making the drive further for my wife. We don’t live within walking distance of a grocery store. I genuinely need a car. My wife needs one too. I don’t live in a city with with even shitty options for public transit. It’s just not an option. My wife doesn’t work in the same city she works in, there is no bus, and the nearest bus stop to my job is a 45 minute walk from my job, and a 2 hour bus trip.

          It’s a 10 minute drive for both of us.

          If I could sell my car I fucking would. I love my car, but I’d give it up in a heartbeat if it were an option. I just don’t have the option. This is without children. When a child is thrown in to the mix we will only depend on having two cars more.

          Our mothers are aging, they live here and don’t have other support. She has licenses that lock her in to this state. We aren’t moving, and this city is a car city.

  • Baines@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    google used to do this type of stuff then you get SEO shit and in the same way people would try to game the system and ruin it

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Aye, this be the problem. As long as there is a profit motive the AI is going to steer you to whatever makes them money, be it whoever works the SEO game or pays for API access.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s why you charge the end user of the AI: it keeps your own interests aligned with theirs.

        Just don’t make grocerybot a free service. Make it a paid service, and then it works.

  • eclectic_electron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is surprisingly difficult problem because different people are okay with different brand substitutions. Some people may want the cheapest butter regardless of brand, while others may only buy brand name.

    For example my wife is okay with generic chex from some grocery stores but not others, but only likes brand names Cheerios. Walmart, Aldi, and Meijer generic cheese is interchangable, but brand name and Kroger brand cheese isn’t acceptable.

    Making a software system that can deal with all this is really hard. AI is probably the best bet, but it needs to be able to handle all this complexity to be useable, which is a lot of up front work

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      As long as the AI has access to their ongoing purchase histories it’s actually quite easy to have this for day to day situations.

      Where it would have difficulty is unexpected spikes in grocery usage, such as hosting a non-annual party.

      In theory, as long as it was fine tuned on aggregate histories it should be decent at identifying spikes (i.e. this person purchased 10x the normal amount of perishables this week, that typically is an outlier and they’ll be back to 1x next week), but anticipating the spikes ahead of time is pretty much impossible.

      • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Both of these problems could feasibly be solved by user input. If you had the ability to set rules for your personal experience, problems like that would only last as long as it takes the user to manually correct.

        Like, “Ai, I bought groceries for a party on March 5th. Don’t use that bill to predict what I need” or “stop recommending butter that isn’t this specific brand”

    • Prophet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also quite difficult from a vision perspective. Tons of potential object classes, objects with no class (e.g., leftovers, homemade things), potential obfuscation if you are monitoring the refrigerator/cabinets. If the object is in a container, how do you measure the volume remaining of that substance? This is just scratching the surface I imagine. These problems individually are maybe not crazy challenging but they are quite hard all together.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        You don’t use vision, or if using it you are only supplementing a model that is mostly using purchase histories as the guiding factor.

        • TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          But you actually need vision because purchase history is not indicative of my future purchases. Sometimes I buy butter and eat it in a 3 days and buy again. Sometimes I’m not in the mood and have a chunk of butter to sit in my fridge for 3 weeks. It’s honestly totally random for a lot of things. It depends only on my mood at the moment.

          • kromem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’d be surprised at how many of those things you think are random would actually emerge as a pattern in long enough purchase history data.

            For example, it might be that there’s a seasonality to your being in the mood. Or other things you’d have brought a week before, etc.

            Over a decade ago a model looking only at purchase history for Target was able to tell a teenage girl was pregnant before her family knew just by things like switching from scented candles to unscented.

            There’s more modeled in that data than simply what’s on the receipt.

        • Prophet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I agree, in the context of the tweet, that purchase history is enough to build a working product that roughly meets user requirements (at least in terms of predicting consumed items). This assumes you can find enough purchase history for a given user. Even then, I have doubts about how robust such a strategy is. The sparsity in your dataset for certain items means you will either a.) be forced to remove those items from your prediction service or b.) frustrate your users with heavy prediction bias. Some items also simply won’t work in this system - maybe the user only eats hotdogs in the summer. Maybe they only buy eggs with brownie mix. There will be many dependencies you are required to model to get a system like this working, and I don’t believe there is any single model powerful enough to do this by itself. Directly quantifying the user’s pantry via vision seems easy in comparison.

      • Bread@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        There could be an easy party mode button in which it just ignores the usual and picks likely food options for a party.

      • eclectic_electron@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly I would be perfectly happy with the service like this, even if I had to manually input what groceries I need. It’s still an incredibly complex problem though. AI is probably better suited for it than anything else since you can have iterative conversations with latest generation AIs. That is, if I tell it I need cereal, it looks at my purchase history and guesses what type of cereal I want this week, and adds it to my list, I can then tell it no, actually I want shredded mini wheats.

        So it would probably have to be a combination of a very large database and information gathering system with a predictive engine and a large language model as the user interface.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    We were already robbed of the brief value stage of AI, it came out of the gate with a corporate handler and a ™

    The internet had a stretch where it was just useful, available and exciting. This does not.

    • danielbln@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Local models are a thing, and GPT is extremely useful in some cases, even with the corporate handholding. I find the whole space super exciting, personally.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The accessibility of local models is nowhere near what the early web was. We could ALL have a geocities website and our own goofy “corner of the internet” without the extra bullshit.

        • sighofannoyance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          be the person that makes local ai’s the new geo cities. Make the tech accessible bro! I will invest in your crowdfund

          .

          Ø.

          . p

          after due dilligence only… that is

    • reassure6869@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      if you mean “a useful stage where I have to learn nothing and do nothing” then sure, but if you mean “a useful stage where interested parties can hack on cool things” then Im pretty sure we’ve had an early version of that for almost a decade now and my prediction is its only going to get better (in the same way computing resources always ebb and flow between server and client). right now we are in a very heavy server-oriented stage because bringup costs are high.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    So many people in this thread saying “you can already do this if you just do all these extra steps” like avoiding extra work isn’t the whole point.

    • Billygoat@catata.fish
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Exactly. But also I’m blown away that most grocery stores don’t list inventory and prices on the website. I can only think this is because they don’t want to show prices in an attempt to get you to go to the store.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        They absolutely don’t want to make automatic comparison shopping that easy. The goal of every grocery store is to get you there with one or two specific good deals they advertise and then have you do the rest of your shopping there because nobody wants to go to a second store and MAYBE get a slightly better deal but also maybe get a worse deal.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But also I’m blown away that most grocery stores don’t list inventory and prices on the website. I can only think this is because they don’t want to show prices in an attempt to get you to go to the store.

        yuuup.

      • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean… Yeah? Grocery stores want you in the store. If they didn’t they’d be shipping only warehouses.

        • Billygoat@catata.fish
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I just mean that they must have done some research that says it is more profitable to only list a few prices instead of everything.

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m sure Sara is not ready to be served the optimal outcome from a competitive multi-agent simulation. Because when everyone gets that AI, oh boy the local deals on groceries will be fun.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The equilibrated state your imagining never happens. This is like talking about when the ocean finally levels out. The ocean’s never going to level out. There will always be waves to surf.

  • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cant I get both? Here are your weekly projections, sir. You will need to get this list of items at these locations and here is what you would look like as a latin american dictator. Enjoy