• mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I want a rundown of all the crimes House commits and what % of episodes contain felonies.

    Cause they’re certainly missing the “Foreman, break into the dudes house and tell me everything in his crawlspace” scene, and the “Cameron, lie to him and drug him with this non-approved treatment and let’s see if he starts dying quicker or slower.”

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      110
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nearly every episode contains a felony since he’s constantly taking medication obtained via prescription fraud.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That came later, I think at least to begin with he was just prescribing to himself, then lost privileges.

        I don’t think it is outright illegal to prescribe yourself drugs. Judy discouraged.

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t think it is outright illegal to prescribe yourself drugs. Judy discouraged

          Nah, it’s super illegal. At least in the version of New Jersey the show takes place in.

          They point that out a couple of times during the run of the series and if memory serves, that’s actually one of the few crimes of his that he ALMOST gets in real trouble for.

          That and stealing Wilson’s prescription pad to make it seem like he’s the one prescribing them. Which is of course a couple seperate crimes 😄

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Literally the best part of every episode is when the hospital doctors break into the patients home and start ransacking it looking for clues as to their illness, which as we all know, is taught semester 1 in medical school. Semester 2 is when you learn how to do actual medical tests.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not to bring things down but… when you’ve been dealing with an undiagnosed illness which has gone on for months (i.e. me), you’ll be happy to take someone with the bedside manner of Dr. House as long as you get some sort of answer.

    And no, it isn’t lupus.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not how a bidet works. Too much pressure; it’s their showers. They love being clean.

          • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            So in most homes I’ve been the piping organ water is all the same for toilets, showers and the kitchen.

            So is there any difference from the water that comes out of a shower head? Or hell even the garden hose outside

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Garden hose is a bit different. Bacteria can get in through the hoses open end, and it’s really hard to completely dry out the inside, so it’s just a microbe fest inside there. The issue isn’t so much the plumbing, straight from the spigot is… Well, still a bit worse because it’s outside but should be ok. It’s the hose that’s the problem. Beyond that, yeah water in any tap inside should be essentially the same, barring filters after the plumbing.

              Edit: just thought, some houses may use a grey water recycling system for, say, running the toilet and shower. I imagine that’s rare enough that if it applies to you, you probably already know, but… Well, ya know.

              • jasondj@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                There is a slight issue…there was a time when a lot of spigots were made with brass containing high levels of lead.

                The amount of exposure from infrequent, or even sparodic use over several year, is more than likely nothing to worry about though.

                Even still, when shopping for a spigot, you’ve got to be careful. A lot are marked “Non-Potable Use” for that reason.

                Also I feel something is gross about drinking from places we don’t usually drink from. Like we use different cleaning products there and we clean them less frequently, and they seem inferior to me as a result. Especially the bathroom sink. Like someone just pooped three feet away from it a couple hours ago and then touched the thing and uuuuuggggghhhh.

                • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah I mean you should probably just drink from the normal tap if it’s not inconvenient to do so, and I do get the ick factor. Just saying it probably isn’t very different for any interior faucet, and only marginally so for an outside spigot.

  • SkyerixBOI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 months ago

    House was the only medical show for me that was able to be this predictable, and I would watch. Hmmm… maybe time for another watch.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s because the show wasn’t about the medicine or solving the case, it was about what it cost to be House.

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah, but considering it’s supposed to be Sherlock Holmes as a doctor, shouldn’t it at least be a little bit about solving the case?

        Before anyone questions it being a Holmes show, since that seems to have gone over so many people’s heads:

        House = Home (Holmes)

        Both of their colleagues are named Watson

        Both use deduction to solve mysterious cases (medical vs criminal) that no one else can crack.

        Both live at 221B Baker Street

        Both have drug issues

        Both play musical instruments in order to think things through

        House is shot by a man named Jack Moriarty (Moriarty is frequently presented as a nemesis of Holmes)

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          10 months ago

          You forgot the most important factor.

          The writers literally said they based House off of Sherlock Holmes stories.

        • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also mysteries are frequently solved in a way the audience could not have known because it was with information only House/Holmes had. But it’s expected in a medical drama because the audience isn’t full of doctors.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Both live at 221B Baker Street

          For real? I never watched House, but him being inspired by Holmes doesn’t surprise me given the idea I got through pop-cultural osmosis. But he actually lives on the same address? That sounds a bit too on the nose.

        • lledrtx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wait no way really? It’s basically a ripoff then? Never watched the show but do they bill it as such?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You could call Elementary and Sherlock ‘rip-offs’ too. The fun thing about public domain material is that anyone can do whatever the hell they want with it. Personally, I think all three shows were good (or at least started as good).

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I really liked House. I don’t know shit about medicine, but my whole job is troubleshooting, and the troubleshooting in the show has actually helped me.

        Some big takeaways…

        Most hard to solve issues are really just a combination of 2 or 3 simple issue acting together in a weird way.

        Everybody lies - I don’t necessarily agree with this in my line of work, but I frequently use “Not everybody tells the truth” as a better rule. I can’t recall having a client lie to me, but every day they tell me things that are wrong or untrue because they don’t understand what happened.

        When in doubt, do a shit-ton of pain killers and berate people for not having the answer, even though you don’t have it yourself (shift blame/expectation management)

  • spez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s great when you watch it off and on but it’s painful binging it.

    • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      All the Sherlock Holmes type derivatives are much like that, back in the day when I would watch a bunch of episodes it was mostly enjoyable because Hugh Laurie is just such a great actor.

      Lupis was always the metaphorical man caught holding the gun lol

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      The same-y ness of the episodes really stands out when you do this. On a binge, I found myself watching it more for the character arcs than the diagnostic drama… which is not the show’s strong point. :(

      • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        it was made for the once a week way of watching. just choose a day to be house day every week. instantly better experience

        • jasondj@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s weird how a lot of those types of shows seem different just a few years later, in the streaming/binge-watching era.

          Those types of shows…House, CSI, etc…the formula itself just gets so dull and routine over and over again with nothing in between.

          Conversely, long drawn out dramas that don’t reset 90% of the stage every episode, like Breaking Bad work really well. I’d say it even works well for most of GoT.

          In fact, I’d say it makes some shows better. “Lost” was a big letdown for people watching it week to week and season to season over the course of nearly six years. But when I binge-watched it for the first time over a few weeks, I don’t think it was nearly as bad as an ending as people make it out to be.

          I never watched Weeds all the way through. I quit when it started getting too self-aware and cliche (somewhere around the tunnel). It was just right before that, and it started to fall off. I think watching it in a binge manner might be a bit more quaint because that shark-jumping becomes part of its charm.

          • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            LOST is one of my favorite shows ever. I’m jealous of people who got to watch it live and discuss at work the next day. I think a lot of people watched it just for the mysteries though and not for the characters, the ending is much better from a character arc perspective versus a question answering perspective

          • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Part of what made LOST enjoyable was the wait between episodes, and the rabid fandom that generated. Fan forums were all over the place, and people just kept lobbing theory after theory out there about WTF was going on. Add in frame-by-frame breakdowns, the few times writers proved a few fans true on some truly wild ideas, and the official ARGs, and it just became this whole phenomenon. Neither of the show’s endings were ever going to live up to that hype, and in retrospect, makes those takes as much in the moment as the show itself.

            Re-watching it on a binge is doable, but more closely emulates what the producers experienced prior to broadcast. Which is to say it’s entertaining, but not the same entertainment.

            • jasondj@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Yes, this is a fair point. The wait between episodes was just as important as the episodes themselves. All the community buildup, discussion, fan theories, etc.

              That may not be the majority of viewers, but they certainly are your shows “free” hype men. They’re the ones that’ll tell everyone they know who would be interested (pre-qualified leads!) all about their favorite new obsession. They’re also the ones that’ll buy merch, or name their kid after Daenerys Targaryen (they say that Danielle is an old family name and they just call their girl Danni for short but you know it’s because they were heavy GoT watchers).

              Maybe that’s part of why streaming services are going back to weekly (i.e. Handsmaid Tale) or split-season (i.e. Stranger Things) releases. It’s not just for profit…the suspense between the episodes can be just as, if not more, valuable and enjoyable as the episodes themselves.

              • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Maybe that’s part of why streaming services are going back to weekly (i.e. Handsmaid Tale) or split-season (i.e. Stranger Things) releases. It’s not just for profit…the suspense between the episodes can be just as, if not more, valuable and enjoyable as the episodes themselves.

                I’d say so. If nothing else, consider what a proper episode-end cliffhanger is to experience in that scenario. It’s a radically different thing.

      • spez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        well painful might be a bit overboard but it does get repetitive pretty fast for me personally.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    Cuddy: You can’t set your patient on fire, House! House: I only need to burn him for a few minutes. It’ll make your ass look thinner. Cuddy: Fine. Just do it while the lawyer is out to lunch.