• CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Make a show with Legacy in the title

      It has absolutely no impact

      It’s like poetry it rhymes.

    • kn33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I literally watched it and still didn’t remember it until you said that name. Still couldn’t tell you a damn thing about it.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course you can, it’s about superheroes, you can see it in the costumes.

        Nothing besides that though. I also watched it and am drawing a blank. I think there was a scene with a boat for some reason?

        So yeah, canceling it made perfect sense.

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I distinctly recall trying to watch the first few minutes and wondering to myself how they got the Power Rangers sets & props to look so clean. It was a fetid pile of wet shit otherwise, but the palpable cringe each actor seemed to be trying not to emote along with their lines was entertaining in a way. 🤷🏼‍♂️🤣

    • Nusm@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never heard of it, and my wife & I are on Netflix multiple times a week.

      As a side note, other streaming services that took their stuff off of Netflix to make their own service because “hurr durr we want that money!”, have discovered that it’s hard to run and not always profitable. There are a LOT of things that have been gone off of Netflix for awhile that have suddenly started to show back up because content owners have discovered that it’s much easier to let Netflix deal with the infrastructure and just get paid. I remember when Netflix had almost everything you could want to watch in one place, and it was glorious! If you’ve cancelled over the lack of content, maybe give it another look. If you cancelled over the cost, maybe it’s more worth it now?

      I’m not a Netflix shill, I just remember the days when it was awesome because of the massive selection, and I’m hopefully seeing it slowly coming back around.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The massive selection existed because cable users paid for it. The big companies made content based on cable customers. Then licensed to netflix for extra profit just like they licensed to other countries’ broadcasters for extra profit.

        Then netflix killed the cable income, so it wasn’t profitable to make these shows, netflix wouldn’t pay the cost of licensing these shows for the actual cost so the licenses dropped and everyone had to make their own service’s.

        Rather, it’s netflix that is finding out that it’s difficult to make good shows, they lived on licencing other people’s shows, paid for by cable, then when they killed that money source they are struggling to produce good enough content to make their service worth it.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Netflix didn’t kill cable’s income, cable did that all on its own.

          Netflix has had some successes with their own shows, however their approach has always been “throw all the shit against the wall and see what sticks”.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, netflix did. Let’s not be silly. Cable succeeded by itself for decades then netflix came along and said have everything for ten bucks a month. Everyone switched. Cable started its death ride its been on since.

            But netflix could only offer everything for ten bucks a month because Cable customers were the ones paying for that content to be made.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Netflix offered an alternative, but people left cable because cable was crap. If cable was good, people wouldn’t have left.

              Netflix could still offer things for $10 a month, but they don’t want to, because now they’re crap, too. They’re not crap because cable isn’t producing any more shows, though - the old shows are still just as strong of a draw as they always have been. However it doesn’t help that these old shows have exclusive deals where they all end up on different platforms.

              The main reason we don’t have good new shows anymore is the strikes. Covid a little bit, too, but in general the writers and actors just haven’t been working so much.

              • echo64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                no, people left cable because cable was /expensive/ it wasn’t crap. netflix was just cable content all in one place and cheaper. Then it switched to netflix produced content and they have struggled. as evidenced by everyone wishing it was like the old days.

            • Nusm@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This isn’t about cable, they’re sinking themselves by burying their head in the sand and pretending like streaming isn’t a threat - all while bleeding subscribers.

              As for Netflix, you’ve got your take backwards. Netflix was licensing all of the content and paying the content owners fees. NBC, CBS, Paramount, HBO (now Max), AMC, Disney… they all got greedy. They saw the money Netflix was making, and they thought they could make more by keeping the content, creating their own services, and raking in the cash. Unfortunately that created a glut of new problems. Some of these providers don’t have enough content to justify their price to consumers. Consumers struggle to find shows they want to watch now because content is spread so thin, so they give up. Most importantly, consumers feel nickeled & dimed. They don’t want to pay for numerous services, so it becomes a game of “which one(s) am I going to subscribe to, and which am I going to ignore?”. Many of these services have struggled and lost money, so they’ve decided that it’s easier to license the content back to Netflix, let Netflix handle pricing, infrastructure, subscriber retention, etc., and they can cash the licensing checks.

              • jacksilver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Their take on Netflix isn’t backwards. Netflix was able to get all of those shows initially because the streaming licenses were really cheap, cause they were making enough money through cable subscriptions. Once streaming caught on though the companies started raising the prices and/or withholding content because the cable money stopped flowing. Remember Friends cost Netflix $100 million and over $500 million for Seinfeld.

                • Nusm@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You could be right, but my understanding was that content owners pulled content from Netflix because they thought they could make more money setting up their own streaming services. Most are at worst losing money, and at best not bringing in projected profits, so they’re moving content back to Netflix and taking the licensing money.

    • Sharpiemarker@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk how the person never has never heard of it before. It’s not like Netflix are subtle about promoting their original series.

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Neither have I and I have the damn screenshot saved. It also looked so utterly meh that I never bothered ever looking it up in the first place. Like this still easily could have passed for the cover of some daddy/mommy porn superhero series with how cheesy it looks.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more like Boardwalk Empire meets Invincible.

          But don’t expect the same level of quality.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also highly dependent on viewing history. There’s a ton of Netflix originals I’ve never seen because I don’t watch that kind of show. I don’t think I’ve ever had Bridgerton thrown in my face, but it’s just not my kind of show. This and that one with Mike Meyers I’ve seen a ton of the time, though.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never heard of it until now, I’m online all the time. Cancelled Netflix 6 months ago since the quantity and quality balance of their content wasn’t worth it anymore with all the price increases.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never heard of it. Netflix also likes to put you in little niche bubbles as soon as you show interest in one genre.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    I watched the whole thing. I’ve certainly seen worse from bigger studios.

    If Jupiter’s Legacy had gotten a second season, I would’ve watched it.

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I thought that was fucking bizarre. No packer or anything. Just a fucking… box? Or are they insinuating that being a superhero means your dick is shaped like a pyramid?

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I came to the conclusion that Netflix doesn’t understand marketing. The hit shows they had seem to be lucky finds and they think they can reproduce that by dumping money into a show and telling no one about it. Like fanboys will just watch whatever Daddy Netflix gives them.

    Cowboy Bebop is a perfect example. They market it to die hard anime fans and no one else. Those fans hate it and it gets cancelled. The show wasn’t that bad and people like my dad would have loved it, had he ever heard about it.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hard agree on the live action Cowboy Bebop. It was pretty good, all in all.

      Honestly they nailed Jet so hard, it was fantastic. Just his whole vibe captured perfectly.

      The original stuff was pretty good. It faltered hardest when it tried to recreate shots one for one from the anime.

      Well, it faltered the hardest with Ed in the final scene. Not a good lasting impression.

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yup. I don’t think it was a perfect retelling but the episodes with Spike, Jet, and Faye just being bounty hunters were so damn enjoyable. I’m really bummed we didn’t get more of that.

    • stephfinitely@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really like cowboy bebop the live action and anime and was crushed when they canceled it. But no one out side of anime circles hear about. Everyone I have told to watch it has loved it. They need to be more selective again and market those select shows and slowly build a catalog of good shows. Instead they where worried they where going to lose people when other companies started their own streaming services and just green lit everything and then canceled 99% of them before people could even find them.

      • set_secret@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        i friggen loved it. So fucked that the loud anime crowd lost their shit that a live action show apparently didn’t perfectly replicate in every single detail their beloved child.

        Perfect became the murderer of really great.

        Seriously im still so angry it got canned.

        • CptEnder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Finally someone like me! I really enjoyed that it wasn’t a complete recreation of the anime, which would be impossible to recapture the perfect madness that was the original. Instead they kinda riffed on the madness of the original in their own way which I think really plays to the jazz tone of the show.

          I fucking hate weeb fans for reasons like this they really are the worst, fans in general ruin good things. I also liked the live action GITS but that also took flak from other directions.

          I too am still salty

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My dad actually really liked the cowboy bebop live action show, I think he said he even watched some of the anime after, which is pretty crazy as I don’t think he’s ever watched anime intentionally on his own before.

  • aew360@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That show sucked ass. I got through the first episode. I’m sure it worked better as a comic book. The villain was like, killing the superheroes left and right and then one of the heroes finally killed the villain (who had escaped prison or something) and then the papa hero got all pissy because “We don’t kill!” Just really stupid stuff

    • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Googled just to see, it’s a Mark Millar comic didn’t need to read any further, it was an edgy take at superheroes, how rare from him

      • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought about Frank Miller’s Hardboiled reading your comment. Would love to see a live action from that comic.

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I watched the first episode and thought this is stupid, badly acted, and treading old ideas. Super hero’s aren’t my favorite genre but there is a fair amount of content in the genre I like. This one was just bad. Also when i saw the costumes they were so bad I expected a pullback shot showing this was a movie set within the show.

      • aew360@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Amish superheroes! With the ability to molest their younger sisters with the strength of an ox and the speed of a cheetah.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find it funny how both Netflix and Amazon are just so good at burning money on mediocre shite nowadays. Amazon’s studio output has always been throwing obscene money at any pitch or stupid idea, but once upon a time when Netflix promoted their own shows, you just knew they were going to be worth watching.

    It’d be fine, if both companies hadn’t ruined their products and laid off hundreds, if not thousands of people.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Netflix still CAN make good shows, usually they’re from Spain or south Corea though

        • neptune@dmv.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          My car got towed when I went to the doctor (I’m too overweight to walk very far) and my medical bill was huge, so now I am bankrupt. At least I can sell my gun range that’s also a bar for cash. If I don’t fix my financial situation now, my kids will never be able to afford college, forever dooming my descendents to a life of burger flipping and penury.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically, it isn’t burning any money, it’s all a tax write-off and they don’t necessarily have any profit to report to the IRS. The US Film Industry has always been like that: employ all your friends, keep the money flowing, buy nice houses for the shareholders and producers, then pull the rug on anybody who worked for “percent of net profit/earnings.” Hollywood accounting, they call it.

      A lot less funny with all the context.

  • cygnosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I watched it. It was a good looking show. And the origin story (which took over half the season I think) was well done. But where it really fell down is that none of the characters are likeable. At the end of the season I was kind of relieved it was over because I didn’t care whether any of them lived or died.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t think it was that good anyway, but it boggles belief that they spent that much on one season of anything. 200 million is a ludicrous amount of money, and they just flushed it and went “oops lol, anyway, here’s wonderwall”.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope they didn’t use that image in any of the marketing. It just looks like geriatric super heroes. Why would I want to watch that?

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That sounds far more interesting that the run-of-the-mill crap churned out by the MCU.

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s a comedy, I see the potential for hilarity. Geriatric superheroes mentoring the next generation of heroes could be a good comedy drama.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And yet people still pay for the shit. Because… social peer pressure? Addiction?

    All I read is how people can’t afford shit, streaming is expensive, the content sucks, I can’t steal passwords anymore; yet people keep paying for this shit and their subscribership keeps increasing.

    People need to vote with their wallets.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      People still pay for it because canceling an account apparently isn’t cancelling an account…

      I dropped Netflix years ago, cancelled the account like I can’t even log in, it says account doesn’t exist, and yet up until I noticed it a few months ago they were still taking money from my PayPal…

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Production of any show is a “write off”. You can write off any business related costs. Cancelling a show doesn’t change that.

      Cancelling does stop the current spending on that show, and promote other shows above it. That’s the only savings they get. Spending $200 million and cancelling a show after a month is a boneheaded chain of decisions.

      • plz1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe that’s why they are on this kick of annual price increases, under the guise of “rising costs” due to “inflation”.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are just bad at running a business. They were the only game in town for a long time. They still didn’t make money. That’s pretty bad.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Marketing for Hollywood shows and movies is normally a huge fraction of the budget. If they spend $200m to make the show and realize it’s shit, if they cancel the marketing budget the loss might be smaller than if they spend $150m to market the shit out of it and it flops like they expected.

        What sucks is when they remove it from their own streaming services. I can’t see how that helps anyone. It costs next to nothing to add it to the catalogue and make it available to anybody who happens to find it. That way all the hard work of the actors, directors, gaffers, best boys, and everyone else involved isn’t just thrown away.

      • Chriswild@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure it’s for tax deductions as it’s a loss if they cancel it. The cost to host the show would be completely negotiable as people would just watch something else.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not an extra write off just because it doesn’t make money. The tax effect is the same as a successful show.

          • Chriswild@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m pretty sure that’s not the case and that they can’t write it off as a loss unless they cancel it. I’ve specifically read about that happening with HBO, Disney and Netflix.

            To chalk it up to stupidity when it’s a reoccurring thing among big businesses is stupidity; they’re doing it for a reason and typically that reason is money.

            • triclops6@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ooh so it’s both

              Kevon is right, one tax benefit is the cost of the show: whether they cancel it or not they get to write off those expenses, and they get a tax break there

              Chris would be correct too though: if Netflix holds the IP as assets on the balance sheet, they’d be held at some present value of expected royalties. When they cancel the show id imagine that asset value takes a shit, that’s a write off, so tax benefit there

              That said no business does this to make money from the tax asset, you have to lose more than the government gives you back

              More likely Netflix is high off it’s own farts and thinks just money can make cinema magic and it clearly can’t.

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You “pretty sure” and think you read something? I’m telling you, all production costs are tax deductions. As long as they’re actual business expenses, not personal ones. It doesn’t matter if the show is a success. I’m telling you that’s how accounting works. There’s no check box if a show is successful.

              Promoting the show is a different cost that they will save now that they cancelled it. Link the article you read.

              • Chriswild@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m pretty sure you can manage a search about why streaming platforms remove shows. Disney did it with Willow and HBO did it with loads of shows after the merger.

                It’s not like you have cited shit and you’re the one making claims about taxes from the start.

  • NotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I stongly feel there should be a rule for streaming platforms to make a satisfying season finale every time, because of the extremely high risk of cancellation every time they make something.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should be a contractual obligation that if a show is optioned for additional seasons and Netflix cancels it, there are at the very least on the hook for a movie to tie up any outstanding plot points.

      Not only to give the fans of the show closure, but potential new audience the confidence that the content available on their platform will likely have a satisfying narrative arc.

      • DragonAce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’ve lost count how many times I click on a show to potentially watch and see that its from like 3 or 4 years ago and has only 1 season. I immediately move on and don’t even bother at that point.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They probably want to sell it and when they saw that it might not be doing well they pulled it before enough data was gathered to show it was a flop.